⚠️

Risk scores are statistical indicators based on prescribing patterns compared to specialty peers. They are NOT allegations of fraud, misconduct, or improper care. Many legitimate medical reasons can explain outlier prescribing.

Read our methodology →

Hangjun JangM.D., PH.D.

Internal Medicine · Flushing, NY 11354

NPI: 1568607919

Share:

22

🟡 Moderate

Risk Flags

High cost outlier (population + peer)High antipsychotic prescribing (65+)High fills per patient

Risk indicators are statistical patterns, not allegations. Learn more

34,455

Total Claims

$12.8M

Drug Cost

1,157

Beneficiaries

$11K

Cost/Patient

Risk Score Breakdown 22/100

Low (0)Moderate (15)Elevated (30)High (50+)
Elderly antipsychotic prescribing+10
Cost per patient outlier+6
High fills per patient+3

Score components are additive. Read full methodology

Peer Comparison vs. 110,156 Internal Medicine providers

-81%

Opioid rate vs peers

0.4% vs 2.2% avg

+682%

Cost per patient vs peers

$11K vs $1,411 avg

+100%

Brand preference vs peers

21.3% vs 10.6% avg

🔎 Data Overview

💰

Cost per patient is 682% above the specialty average. Extreme cost outliers may indicate prescribing of unnecessarily expensive brand-name drugs or inappropriate drug utilization.

Insights generated from CMS data analysis. Statistical patterns are not accusations — always consider clinical context.

Opioid Prescribing

0.4%

Opioid Rate

150

Opioid Claims

$8,033

Opioid Cost

Long-Acting Rate

Brand vs Generic

79% generic

Brand: 7,220 claims · $6.4M

Generic: 26,672 claims · $6.4M

Patient Profile

74

Avg Age

54%

Female

1.42

Avg Risk Score

Explore More

Data from CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2023. Risk scores are statistical indicators, not allegations of wrongdoing.Methodology · About · Dispute this data