⚠️

Risk scores are statistical indicators based on prescribing patterns compared to specialty peers. They are NOT allegations of fraud, misconduct, or improper care. Many legitimate medical reasons can explain outlier prescribing.

Read our methodology →

Andrew IliffMD

Internal Medicine · Columbia, MO 65201

NPI: 1851654818

Share:

30

🟠 Elevated

Risk Flags

High opioid rate vs specialty peersHigh cost outlier (population + peer)High long-acting opioid rate vs peersElevated antipsychotic prescribing (65+)

Risk indicators are statistical patterns, not allegations. Learn more

2,798

Total Claims

$4.6M

Drug Cost

416

Beneficiaries

$11K

Cost/Patient

Risk Score Breakdown 30/100

Low (0)Moderate (15)Elevated (30)High (50+)
Opioid rate vs specialty peers+10
Long-acting opioid rate+8
Cost per patient outlier+6
Elderly antipsychotic prescribing+5

Score components are additive. Read full methodology

Peer Comparison vs. 110,156 Internal Medicine providers

+449%

Opioid rate vs peers

12.3% vs 2.2% avg

+675%

Cost per patient vs peers

$11K vs $1,411 avg

🔎 Data Overview

💊

Opioid rate is 449% above Internal Medicine peers. This is a significant deviation that may reflect a specialized patient population or concerning prescribing patterns.

💰

Cost per patient is 675% above the specialty average. Extreme cost outliers may indicate prescribing of unnecessarily expensive brand-name drugs or inappropriate drug utilization.

Insights generated from CMS data analysis. Statistical patterns are not accusations — always consider clinical context.

Opioid Prescribing

12.3%

Opioid Rate

344

Opioid Claims

$18K

Opioid Cost

25.6%

Long-Acting Rate

Brand vs Generic

100% generic

Brand: 0 claims · $0

Generic: 2,331 claims · $425K

Patient Profile

73

Avg Age

58%

Female

1.91

Avg Risk Score

Explore More

Data from CMS Medicare Part D Prescriber Public Use File, 2023. Risk scores are statistical indicators, not allegations of wrongdoing.Methodology · About · Dispute this data